
F · NYSE
Reports Oct 22, 2026.
Consensus is $0.41 EPS for Sep 2026 across 7 estimates, ranging $0.35 to $0.52.
Ford's second quarter was an underlying earnings beat and a guidance-raising print, but the headline GAAP result was overwhelmed by the planned BlueOval SK disposition. Adjusted EPS of $0.42 exceeded the $0.33 consensus, while adjusted EBIT rose 17% year over year to $2.5 billion and adjusted EBIT margin expanded 90 basis points to 5.2%. Revenue declined 4% to $48.3 billion, and adjusted free cash flow was $2.1 billion versus $2.8 billion a year ago. Sequentially, revenue increased from $43.3 billion in the first quarter, but reported net income swung from a $2.55 billion profit to a $1.3 billion loss, and operating income fell from $2.33 billion to $638 million.
The print was defined by a stronger Ford Blue, pressure in Ford Pro from aluminum shortages, and continued EV rationalization. Blue EBIT rose $474 million to $1.1 billion despite 8% lower wholesales, while Pro EBIT fell $600 million to $1.7 billion. Model e reduced its loss to $919 million, but revenue fell 56% and volume fell 53%. The $1.3 billion net loss included $4.2 billion of pre-tax special items, principally the $3.6 billion BOSK charge and $0.5 billion of EV cancellation costs. Ford raised its full-year adjusted EBIT and free cash flow targets, partly reflecting expected Novelis-related recovery and about $500 million of IEEPA reimbursement cash.
Ford's operating result improved even as volume declined. Adjusted EBIT rose to $2.5 billion from $2.1 billion a year ago, and adjusted EPS increased to $0.42 from $0.37. The 5.2% adjusted EBIT margin was 90 basis points higher, reflecting better mix, pricing and cost execution in parts of the portfolio. First-half adjusted EBIT reached $6.0 billion, versus $3.2 billion a year ago, and adjusted ROIC improved to 13.2% from 10.1%.
The profitable combustion, hybrid and commercial businesses remained the core of the quarter, but their trajectories diverged. Ford Blue benefited from favorable product mix, pricing, exchange and lower regulatory-compliance expense. Ford Pro remained profitable at a high level, but lower volume and temporary aluminum-related costs weighed heavily on year-over-year earnings.
Ford continued to resize its EV business around customer demand and the revised product roadmap. Model e's year-over-year loss improvement came alongside a sharp reduction in volume and revenue, rather than growth in the current-generation EV portfolio.
The GAAP loss was principally a transaction and portfolio-reset event rather than a reflection of the quarter's adjusted operating result. Following the May closing of the BlueOval SK disposition, Ford redeemed its joint-venture interest, acquired two Kentucky battery plants and assumed a $3.8 billion Department of Energy loan.
Cash generation remained positive but weaker than a year ago, while the balance sheet absorbed the BOSK-related debt assumption and continued investment. Ford's company cash net of debt moved from positive $7.7 billion at year-end to negative $0.3 billion at June 30, partly because the assumed DOE loan increased company debt.
Ford Credit provided a larger contribution to the quarter, supported by financing margin and favorable mix, although consumer credit metrics moved modestly against the company. The financing arm also retained substantial funding flexibility with leverage unchanged from a year ago.